Industries / Manufacturing

You have outgrown your systems. We help you choose what replaces them & we make them work on your floor.

Independent MRP selection, validation and implementation for manufacturers who need the systems that run their operation to actually run it. We are an implementation partner for MRPeasy, Katana and Cin7. We take no commissions and no referral fees. The recommendation comes from your requirements.

Where it shows up

You know you need independent advice when...

You have no reliable view of production and inventory

"We're making decisions on old numbers, and half of them come from a spreadsheet."

Your production and finance systems do not talk to each other

"The same order gets entered multiple times, and the numbers still don't match."

You've seen other systems but cannot decide which would work best

"Every demo looks good. We can't tell which one fits our business best."

You went live and the floor went back to spreadsheets

"We bought it, we trained on it, and nobody uses it the way it was meant to be used."

You think you have found the right tool, but you are not sure

"We think we've picked the right system. We're about to spend a lot of money finding out."

You have no technology strategy behind your decisions

"We fix what breaks and buy what we're shown. There's no plan, and nobody owns the risk."

What We Do

What Cohesis does for manufacturers

We help manufacturers select, validate and implement the systems that run their opportunity to cash processes: from enquiries, orders and sales, through procurement, production, shipping and invoicing.

Cohesis was established in 2019 and is led by Simon Cohen, who has worked in IT since 1998. We have delivered MRP projects for manufacturers in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, the Philippines, China, the UK and the USA.

The integrations, custom applications and dashboards are built by our own technology team. Selection, implementation, integration and reporting come from one team, so nothing gets handed to a third party halfway through.

Our clients are typically manufacturers of 20 to 200 people, running multi-stage production, holding inventory across more than one location, or exporting.

How we start

Where we start depends on how confident you are in the research you have done

Every implementation that works starts from the same place. The business is confident it has chosen the right system, and that confidence is shared beyond the person who made the decision. Some manufacturers arrive with it already built, because they have done the analysis themselves. Others need it built with them. This is what our MRP Selection and MRP Validation services are for.

Each engagement has a defined scope and is priced as either a fixed fee or a time bank, depending on the size of the work. You know what you are buying before you start.

MRP Selection

You are starting out or weighing multiple options

"Help me choose the right MRP system for my business."

For manufacturers who want the analysis done across multiple platforms before committing. Independent evaluation across the major MRP platforms, mapped against your processes, your data structure and your integration requirements.

We build demonstrations using your own configuration, so you are comparing systems against the way your business works rather than a generic showcase. You get a documented recommendation with the reasoning behind it, the alternatives on record, and a decision you can defend to whoever signs it off.

MRP Validation

You have a preferred choice, but you are not certain

"Tell me whether the system we've chosen is right, before we commit."

For manufacturers who have done the research and reached a preferred choice. We test that thinking against the way your business works, your data and your integration points, and we build demonstrations in your preferred platform using your own configuration, so the test is against your real processes. You get a written report that either confirms the choice or sets out plainly where it will not stand up.

Sometimes it does not stand up. It has happened on several occasions, and in those cases the report has saved a business from a very expensive mistake. That is what you are paying for: finding out before the Implementation budget is committed, not after go-live.

MRP Implementation

The decision is made

"Help me configure and roll it out properly."

Data migration, configuration, integration, role-based training and post go-live support, delivered to the method set out below. You get a system your team can confidently run the business on.

MRP Selection and MRP Validation are separate engagements from the Implementation. What they share is the Discovery and the data analysis. Both require us to map your processes, your application ecosystem and the data behind your decisions, and that is the same work an Implementation begins with.

That work surfaces the integration, process and workflow problems before the Implementation starts, rather than during it. Working through them in advance is what makes the recommendation solid enough to commit to. Your team then arrives at the Implementation already confident in the approach, and that momentum is what carries adoption long after go-live.

Because the Discovery is already complete, the Implementation itself costs less than it otherwise would. Across both engagements the total is higher than an Implementation alone, since it is more work. However, the value of this approach is that the cost is split into stages, the decision is tested before the budget is committed, and the Implementation starts with fewer unknowns in it.

If you have already done your analysis and you are confident, we can take you straight to Implementation. Our tried and trusted approach has been used internationally by manufacturers in chemicals, fabrication, food, furniture, glass and pet food.

Services for Manufacturers

Everything you need, from strategy through to application selection, intergation and beyond.

We cover the full technology lifecycle for manufacturers. Whether you need independent advice, a platform implemented, or systems connected, we have a structured service for where you are right now.

Advice and assessment

ICT Health Check

A fast, structured review of your whole environment: systems, security posture, supplier arrangements and what you are currently paying for. Fixed scope, fixed price, and an honest picture of where you stand.

ICT Risk Management

Where technology risk is building across systems, suppliers and data. Assessed against ISO 27001 and the ACSC Essential Eight where they are relevant, not applied as a blanket checklist.

Technology Roadmap

Where you are now, where you need to be, and the order the work has to happen in. Each recommendation tied to a one, three or five-year horizon. An executive summary your owners or board can act on.

vCIO Leadership

Ongoing technology leadership once the plan is set. Someone senior who knows your environment, keeps the roadmap moving, holds suppliers to account, and is accountable for technology decisions between board meetings.

Software selection and implementation

MRPeasy

Production planning, inventory, purchasing and manufacturing MRP for growing manufacturers. Cohesis is an MRPeasy Authorised Implementation Partner.

Katana

Manufacturing ERP built for made-to-order and multi-channel manufacturers who need real-time visibility across the shop floor and sales channels.

Cin7

Inventory and multi-channel order management for manufacturers selling across multiple channels who need stock and fulfilment in one place.

Finance platforms

Xero, MYOB and QuickBooks implemented and integrated with your production stack. We implement all three; we hold no partner status that makes one our preferred recommendation.

Change Management

Structured adoption support across the rollout: readiness assessment, role-based training, process redesign, and the follow-through that stops staff reverting to the old way once the project team leaves.

Custom development and reporting

API Development

Where native integrations fall short, we build the connection. Katana to Xero, MRP to finance, production to reporting. Built by our own team, not a generic connector that covers the common cases and misses yours.

PowerApp Development

Custom applications built inside your existing Microsoft 365 environment. Processes currently held together by a shared spreadsheet and someone's memory, built into something the whole team can run reliably.

Power BI Dashboards

Reporting leadership can act on, built from the systems you already run. Production, sales, finance and inventory in one view, compiled once and kept current, rather than rebuilt by hand every month.

Our own Microsoft 365 apps

AgendisRISK

Our own risk and compliance platform, built inside Microsoft 365. Risk registers, actions, incidents and board reporting, with ownership and due dates attached to everything, so the register reflects the current position.

AgendisTime

Time and attendance with award interpretation, feeding your MRP time logs straight into Xero payroll. Built for award-heavy sectors, and manufacturing is named first among them.

Platforms

Platforms we work with

Optimo Route Logo
Scoro Logo
GetProspect Logo
MYOB Logo
Pipedrive Logo
Cohesis Technology Roadmap Diagram - 7 Step Guide

Technology strategy

Know what you are building towards, and in what order

Once you know where the gaps are, the next question is what to do about them, in what order, and on what budget. We build a prioritised plan, help your team adopt whatever changes it, and for businesses who want that oversight kept current, provide ongoing vCIO advice without the cost of hiring it permanently.

Priorities set by production impact, not by what is easiest to implement

Every item on the roadmap is ranked by what it changes for the business, not by vendor timelines or what happens to be easiest to deploy next.

An executive summary your owners or board can act on

Named owners, timelines and milestones, presented in a form the people signing it off can read without translation from a technical team.

Technology risk that nobody currently owns, named and ranked

Where technology accountability has gaps across systems, suppliers and data, we name them and rank them before they force a decision at the wrong moment.

Some manufacturers want the plan built once and handed over. Others want it maintained, with someone accountable for technology decisions between board meetings. That is what our vCIO service does.
Delivery method

How we run an implementation: Discover, Transform, Embed

Most implementation problems are visible before a single line of configuration is written. They sit in the data, the process gaps and the integration dependencies nobody mapped at the start. The method exists to surface them there, while they are still cheap to fix.

01
Discover
We map the operation before we touch the system.

We assess what your systems do today, where the data is unreliable, and what has to be true before configuration starts. Where integrations are needed, they are specified here rather than discovered halfway through.

Where we ran your MRP Selection or MRP Validation, most of Discover is already done. The process mapping, the data analysis and the integration specifications carry over, so the Implementation starts further forward than it otherwise would.

Bespoke test case development

Data analysis

Business process mapping

Integration specifications

Data cleansing

02
Transform
Configuration, integration, and build: done in parallel, not in sequence.
Configuration, integrations and reporting are built together, with acceptance testing and training planned jointly with your team rather than handed over at the end.

Bespoke dashboards

Bespoke reporting

System configuration

API development

MRP & CRM integrations

03
Embed
Go-live is where adoption begins.
Training is delivered by role, at the point each team needs it, and reinforced after go-live. Adoption is reviewed at defined intervals so you can see whether the investment landed.

Change management planning & delivery

Hypercare through the first weeks live

Post-implementation review

Role-based training

Change management

Systems fail when the people using them are not ready

A new MRP platform does not produce results on its own. If your team is not ready for it, adoption stalls, workarounds multiply, and the investment erodes quietly. We run the change work alongside the build, from first stakeholder conversation through to the weeks after go-live.

Adoption starts during the analysis, not at go-live

Where we ran the MRP Selection or MRP Validation, your team has already walked us through their own processes, so the new system arrives as something they helped shape rather than something imposed on them.

Resistance surfaced before it stalls the rollout

We assess readiness early and deal with where resistance is building, on the floor and in the office, rather than after it has cost you time.

Training delivered by role, at the point it is needed

Each function learns what it needs when it needs it, with practical guides that stay usable after we leave. Production, purchasing, administration and finance each get what is relevant to them.

Adoption measured at defined intervals

Usage, proficiency and the outcomes you invested for are reviewed at set points, so you know whether it landed and what still needs attention.

Cohesis Change Management Framework diagram showing six phases (Assess, Define, Organise, Prepare, Transform, Sustain) surrounding core elements of Culture, People, Systems, and Process.

In-house build capability

Where the platform stops, we build the rest

No MRP does everything a manufacturer needs, at least not out of the box. Native integrations cover the common cases and stop short of the specific ones. Processes that matter to your business often sit outside the system entirely, on paper or in a spreadsheet, when off-the-shelf products do not handle them.

That work is built by our in-house Agendis technology team. So the same people who scoped your Implementation build the integration, and there is no handover to a third party or anything lost in translation.

Production to finance

Katana to Xero

MRPeasy to Xero

Sales and CRM to production

ProspectCRM to Katana

Pipedrive to MRPeasy

Process automation

Bespoke discounting logic replacing a manual approval process

Custom apps we have built

Chemical testing application

A manufacturer running quality testing outside their MRP system, capturing results on paper rather than against the batch. The app moves testing into the system and ties every result to the production run it belongs to.

Cut list management application

A manufacturer whose cutting instructions were being worked out manually from every order. The app generates them from the order data instead.

After go-live

Your business changes. Your systems have to change with it.

Many of our manufacturing clients stay with us after the Implementation closes. Production lines change, volumes grow, new channels open, and the systems that run the business have to keep up.

Configuration changes as processes change

New integrations, and changes to the ones already running

New reports and dashboards as the questions leadership asks change

Advice on the next decision, before it becomes urgent

Most clients buy this as a time bank and draw it down as they need it, so you are not raising a new engagement every time something small comes up. Where you would rather have us on a retained basis, we do that too.
Manufacturers we have worked with

Five engagements. Five different starting points.

Our clients include manufacturers across chemicals, composites, fabrication, food, furniture, glass and pet food. Some come to us early, before a platform decision is made. Others arrive after a decision has been made and need it tested or delivered.

Andy Elliot

Managing Director, Ayos Composites Inc.

David Johnson

Head of Business and Digital Systems, SpeedShield

Advanced Pet Care Australia

Pet food manufacturing and export - Western Australia

MRPeasy · Xero
Complex data migration involving five years of finance history, moved cleanly into the new production environment without loss of historical reporting. One of two engagements within the same group.

Pool Controls

Pool and spa device manufacturing - National

MRPeasy · Xero
Legacy on-premise system exit, with bespoke API automation of internal discounting replacing a manual approval process that was running outside the MRP entirely.

Speedshield Technologies

Telemetry hardware - Aviation, automotive and mining

Katana · Xero
Migrated from a legacy on-premise ERP to an integrated cloud ecosystem of ProspectCRM, Katana, and Xero. Bespoke API integrations were developed to deliver functionality unavailable through native connectors.

Natural Balance

Pet food manufacturing and export - Western Australia

MRPeasy · Xero
Engaged to align Natural Balance and Austral Pacific systems to the APC group standard through MRPeasy implementation and a migration of historical financial data from Reckon to Xero.
Ready to Move Forward

Tell us where you are, and we will tell you which engagement fits

Whether you are weighing options, close to a decision, or ready to implement, the first call is 30 minutes and there is no charge. We will tell you which of the three engagements fits your situation and what it involves.
Common Questions

FAQS

We are an authorised MRPeasy implementation partner and an implementation partner for Katana and Cin7. We also implement Xero, MYOB and QuickBooks for finance, Pipedrive and ProspectCRM for sales, and Teamwork for project management. Where native integrations between these platforms fall short of your operational requirements, our own technology team builds the integrations to fill the gap.
MRP Selection analyses multiple platforms and recommends one. MRP Validation tests a choice you have already made. Selection suits manufacturers starting out or weighing several options. Validation suits those who have done the research, reached a preferred platform, and want it tested against their processes, data and integration points before committing. Both include the Discovery and data analysis work an Implementation begins with.
No. Many clients come straight to us for the Implementation because they have already done their own analysis and are confident in their choice. Neither service is a prerequisite.
Yes, because the Discovery is already complete when the MRP Implementation starts. The total across two engagements is higher than an Implementation alone, since it is more work. However, the value of this approach is that the cost is split into stages, and the integration, process and workflow problems are surfaced before delivery rather than during it.
You get told, in writing, before the money is committed. It has happened on several occasions. The report sets out where the platform will not hold up against your processes, your data or your integration requirements, and what to look at instead. Finding out at that point costs a fraction of finding out after go-live, when the business has configured around the system, trained staff on it and migrated years of data into it.
Business process mapping, data analysis and cleansing, integration specifications and bespoke test case development. All of it happens before anyone touches a configuration screen. Most implementation problems are not caused by the software. They are caused by configuring a system against processes that were never properly documented.
It depends on data volumes, the number of integrations, your bill of materials structure and training requirements. Simpler implementations with straightforward data and limited integrations can go live in eight to twelve weeks. More complex engagements involving significant data migration, multiple integrations and multi-site operations run longer. The Discovery phase is where the timeline gets scoped properly.
Two failure modes account for most of it. The first is the wrong platform choice, which MRP Selection and MRP Validation address before a dollar is spent on implementation. The second is poor adoption: the system goes live, the team reverts to spreadsheets, and nobody tracks whether the investment delivered anything. The Embed phase addresses that with role-based training, structured change management and review at defined intervals.
Yes. Our in-house Agendis technology team builds the integrations, custom applications and dashboards that off-the-shelf products do not cover. That has included moving paper-based quality testing into the MRP, generating cutting instructions from order data, and automating approval steps that were running manually.
Many of our manufacturing clients stay with us. Processes change, volumes grow and new channels open, so configuration, integrations and reporting need to change with them. Most buy this as a time bank and draw it down as needed. A retained arrangement is available where that suits better.

No. An MRP system runs production planning, bills of materials, inventory and scheduling. ERP usually means a single platform handling everything, finance, sales and production together. Systems like SAP, Infor and Oracle sit in that space, and it is not where we work.

What we do instead is combine an MRP with the other systems your business runs on: finance, CRM, e-commerce, shipping and freight, reporting and document management, all properly integrated. For a manufacturer of 20 to 200 people that delivers equivalent capability at a lower cost. There is no rule that makes one approach right. The deciding factor is whether the integrations hold up, which is why we build and support them with our own team rather than relying on native connectors.